South Africa court suspends Shell seismic survey plan By Claire DOYEN Johannesburg (AFP) Dec 28, 2021 A South African court on Tuesday blocked Shell from using seismic waves to explore for oil and gas in the Indian Ocean, in a victory for environmentalists worried about the impact on whales and other species. Backing a suit filed by conservationists, the High Court in the Eastern Cape town of Makhanda ruled that Shell was "hereby interdicted from undertaking seismic survey operations." The fossil fuel giant had announced plans to start exploration over more than 6,000 square kilometres (2,300 square miles) of ocean off South Africa's Wild Coast region. The Wild Coast is a 300-kilometre (185-mile) stretch of natural beauty, dotted with marine and nature reserves. The area of interest lies 20 kilometres (12 miles) off the coast, in waters 700 to 3,000 meters deep (2,300 to 10,000 feet). Shell's scheme entails using seismic shockwaves which bounce off the sea bed, and whose signature can point to potentially energy-bearing sites. "Many sea creatures will be affected, from whales, dolphins, seals, penguins to tiny plankton that will be blasted," said Janet Solomon, of the environmental group Oceans Not Oil in the runup to the hearing. Exploration had been scheduled to start on December 1 and last up to five months. A Shell spokesperson said Tuesday: "We respect the court's decision and have paused the survey while we review the judgement. - 'Huge victory' - "Surveys of this nature have been conducted for over 50 years with more than 15 years of extensive peer-reviewed scientific research." The campaigners were jubilant at the ruling, but stressed that the relief was only temporary. "It's a huge victory," said Katherine Robinson of the NGO Natural Justice. "But the struggle is not over -- this decision is just the interdict. We understand that the proceedings will continue." A petition against the project had gathered nearly 85,000 signatures. Campaigners said the scheme would entail "one extremely loud shock wave every 10 seconds, 24 hours a day, for five months at a time." Shell argued that it took "great care to prevent or minimise" the impact on wildlife, and promised that the work would strictly follow the guidelines of the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, a UK government adviser on nature conservation. On Tuesday, it also stressed what it described as the benefits for South Africa if oil and gas were found. "South Africa is highly reliant on energy imports for many of its energy needs," the company's spokesperson said. "If viable resources were to be found offshore, this could significantly contribute to the country's energy security and the government's economic development programmes." South Africa's energy ministry had backed the scheme, and lashed those who opposed it as thwarting investment in the country's development. The High Court's ruling comes after a lower court rejected the conservationists' suit in early December. Several fishermen and local groups were also part of the petition.
Climate crisis puts oil in the crosshairs, but dependence persists Paris (AFP) Dec 26, 2021 The climate crisis has put the end of oil onto the agenda, but achieving that is a colossal task given the world economy's deep dependence on petroleum. "In 2021, several developments showed clearly that (the petroleum) industry doesn't have a future," said Romain Ioualalen at the activist group Oil Change International. The International Energy Agency warned in May that an immediate halt to new investment in fossil projects is needed if the world is to reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2050 an ... read more
|
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |